Passing string to a function in C – with or without pointers?
Passing string to a function in C – with or without pointers?
The accepted convention of passing C-strings to functions is to use a pointer:
void function(char* name)
When the function modifies the string you should also pass in the length:
void function(char* name, size_t name_length)
Your first example:
char *functionname(char *name[256])
passes an array of pointers to strings which is not what you need at all.
Your second example:
char functionname(char name[256])
passes an array of chars. The size of the array here doesnt matter and the parameter will decay to a pointer anyway, so this is equivalent to:
char functionname(char *name)
See also this question for more details on array arguments in C.
Assuming that you meant to write
char *functionname(char *string[256])
Here you are declaring a function that takes an array of 256 pointers to char
as argument and returns a pointer to char. Here, on the other hand,
char functionname(char string[256])
You are declaring a function that takes an array of 256 char
s as argument and returns a char
.
In other words the first function takes an array of strings and returns a string, while the second takes a string and returns a character.
Passing string to a function in C – with or without pointers?
An array is a pointer. It points to the start of a sequence of objects.
If we do this: ìnt arr[10];
, then arr
is a pointer to a memory location, from which ten integers follow. They are uninitialised, but the memory is allocated. It is exactly the same as doing int *arr = new int[10];
.